The pure fantasy involved in Paul Krugman’s great scheme to save the economy jumped out in one of his recent blogs where he stated:
“It’s true that printing money isn’t at all inflationary under current conditions – that is, with the economy depressed and interest rates up against the zero lower bound. But eventually these conditions will end. At that point, to prevent a sharp rise in inflation the Fed will want to pull back much of the monetary base it created in response to the crisis, which means selling off the Federal debt it bought.”
So, this really appears to be the heart of the matter in a Krugman-planned economy. “Stimulate” the economy back to health by printing and spending as much money as needed. Once back on a robust trajectory – and before price inflation rears its ugly head – unload the Fed’s treasuries to sop up all of those extra dollars. This is pure Keynesianism, which although proven a flawed theory as far back as the 1970s, is today the dominant theory in world economics.
What could possibly go wrong? Well for starters, what if the entire notion of deficit spending an economy back to health is based on a faulty premise? Four years and six trillion dollars of additional debt later, and we’re still wallowing in an economic malaise. There’s nothing that I can see in this great experiment that indicates a rosy economic future awaits us if we can just borrow ( and print) a few trillion more.
Here’s the real problem: What if a recovery doesn’t happen and price inflation does? Is selling the Fed’s treasuries Krugman’s only parachute once we’ve jumped out of the plane? If price inflation (dollar devaluation) starts to happen rapidly enough that the Fed feels the need to intervene, how will this possibly work?
The Fed currently monetizes more than 60% of the deficit. If the Fed is going to sell its accumulated treasuries to soak up dollars, then this monetization will have to stop. But who on earth (literally) is going to buy all of this debt and 60%+ of the deficit going forward? And even if such buyers did exist, at what price would they possibly be interested in buying near zero yielding bonds in an environment where the dollar is being rapidly devalued? The catch-22 is that the ability of these bonds to soak up dollars falls with the necessity to do so.
The reality is that Krugman’s Fed has painted itself into a corner. Once you start down the path of printing money in order to fund the government, inflation is inevitable. And once that inflation starts, it cannot be stopped. No, Mr. Krugman, I’m afraid that when the dollar ship begins to sink, the idea will be to get off as quickly as possible – not book an extended cruise. Only gold will be capable of soaking up those dollars, not treasuries.
2 Responses
It’s unfathomable to me that a Nobel prize winning economist is devoid of even the slightest understanding of basic, primary school level economics,…and yet it makes absolute sense. All he see’s when he’s pontificating (yet again) about how he’s right (this time), is currency. Currency and money are often confused, but for the time being let’s just call currency money for the sake of those who refuse to educate themselves.
Money is merely an asset which facilitates the exchange of goods and services. Nothing more, and nothing less. A token. Why is that so difficult for he and his like to understand?
The more the tokens, the less they are worth in the exchange, OBVIOUSLY. Wealth is not a pizza. Everyone on the planet could be rich, and equally, everyone on the planet could be poor.
Economics exists with or without currency. Economics is everything, in every corner of the planet and involving every species on the planet. All species produce, exchange symbiotically, and on the other hand they can be parasitic and destructive. It really isn’t rocket science, despite imbeciles like Krugman endlessly tying themselves in knots in an attempt to make it so. Get yourself a copy of ‘Economics in One Lesson’. Have an easy, relaxing read, and within two hours, you will understand a relatively simple subject.
Hello Cameron,
Thank you for sharing your thoughtful perspective on economics! You’ve made some excellent points about the fundamental nature of money and economic principles.
We completely agree that ‘Economics in One Lesson’ is an outstanding resource for understanding these concepts. In fact, we’re so passionate about financial education that we’d be happy to include a complimentary copy with any precious metals order. We believe informed investors make better decisions, and this book is a fantastic starting point.
Have a great day,
Johnny Estes
Vice President