Investors spend a lot of time trying to make the right investment moves; however, there are “mixed signals” that cause making the right decisions difficult if not impossible. Many of the mixed signals come from the Fed’s intervention in the financial markets, which are populated with malinvestments kept alive by the Fed’s manipulations of interest
How is it that almost every mainstream economist is continually proved wrong in their predictions, that almost every prescribed course of action has led to a continual decline in the future economic prospects for the average American? The answer lies in the fact that economics has long since stopped being a field of scientific inquiry and rather exists as a system for misdirection.
Murray Rothbard observed in The Origins of the Federal Reserve (free pdf) that this transition began just over a hundred years ago:
“Throughout the land by the turn of the twentieth century, a legion of economists and other social scientists had arisen, many of them trained in graduate schools in Germany to learn of the virtues of the inductive method, the German Historical School, and a collectivist, organicist state. Eager for positions and power commensurate with their graduate training, these new social scientists, in the name of professionalism and technical expertise, prepared to abandon the old laissez-faire creed and take their places as apologists and planners in a new, centrally planned state.”
Today this is easily seen and verified in almost every mainstream article on economics. I encourage you to do this yourself.
Step 1) Find an article promoting an obvious economic fallacy.
I’ve done this enough to know that it’s very easy in the American press. For this post I thought I would go elsewhere, in this case the UK’s Guardian. After a couple of minutes scanning headlines in the business archives I spotted what appeared to be low hanging fruit: Japan’s pump primed recovery proves US deficit hawks wrong.
It’s only the third paragraph in and we’ve already hit pay dirt.
“Japan has been suffering from near-zero inflation, or even deflation, since the collapse of its stock and housing bubbles in 1990.”
The old central banking chestnut – inflation is good, deflation is bad. We are not allowed to be told that deflationary prices are the natural order of things in a society that is increasing its average standard of living. Goods and services become more affordable due to increases in efficiency and productivity. Both of which are the result of competition and proper investment of capital and not the result of currency debasement and government boondoggles and bailouts.
Here’s another one.
“While we are still in the early days of Abe’s program (He just took office at the end of 2012), the preliminary signs are positive. The economy grew at a 2.4% annual rate in the second quarter, after growing at a 3.6% rate in the first quarter.”
No mention here that GDP is a seriously flawed metric for evaluating economic conditions, as it is positively impacted by printing money and increasing the public debt. Consider the very localized GDP of two transactions occurring a year apart. A dairy farmer sells an individual a gallon of milk for $3. A year later the same two parties carry out the same transaction except this time the gallon of milk is exchanged for $6. And voila, just like that, 100% economic growth according to the economists. Yet both the farmer and his customer are having a considerably more difficult time surviving.
Step 2) Consider the source.
At the top of the article we are shown a picture of the author, Dean Baker, and in place of his position, simply “theguardian.com“. So who is this poor Guardian reporter and how did he come to endorsing such obvious fallacies? Wikipedia reveals the very interesting answer. He’s not a reporter at all. He’s an economist and co-founder of the Washington DC think tank Center for Economic and Policy Research.
So why do such easily debunked economic fallacies still exist in this day and age? Simple, they are necessary to convince the masses to go along with policies that are contrary to their own best interests. Or stated more obliquely on CEPR’s website:
“In order for citizens to effectively exercise their voices in a democracy, they should be informed about the problems and choices that they face. CEPR is committed to presenting issues in an accurate and understandable manner, so that the public is better prepared to choose among the various policy options.”
Step 3) Follow the money.
And now to tie it all together. Who funds Dean Baker and the CEPR? Fortunately they have made it easy for us by listing some of their principal 2012 supporters:
- American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE)
- American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME)
- Arca Foundation
- Atlantic Philanthropies
- Ford Foundation
- Moriah Foundation
- National Association of Letter Carriers
- National Bankers Foundation
- Public Welfare Foundation
- Rockefeller Brothers Fund
- Russell Sage Foundation
- Service Employees International Union (SEIU)
- Sloan Foundation
- Streisand Foundation
- The Advocacy Fund
- United Steelworkers
In just a single article, it’s easy to see how the game is played. It’s been over a hundred years now since economics had anything to do with an actual science. Economists have long since found it far more lucrative to act as propagandists for those who benefit from the destruction of sound money and a productive economy.
- Economics as propaganda
- Friday’s malinvestments sink Crusoe’s retirement
- Yellen nomination fails to fillip metals markets
- The disingenuous Mr. Buffet
- Massive Sell Order Sends Gold To Three Month Lows
- No tapering: a watershed moment
- Canadian billionaire sees end of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency
- Larry Summers bows out; inflation a shoo-in?
Despite the buzz about Janet Yellen being selected to head the Fed, so far the gold and silver markets are unimpressed. Over the months leading us to Obama’s selection, there was much speculation that a Yellen appointment would fillip gold and silver prices, but that was not the case. Prices were expected to rise because
There is no great challenge to being successful when you have the sole legal right to create new money. On the other hand, convincing the American people and Congress to go along with such a scheme through the creation of a third central bank, the Federal Reserve, was no small task. But with that task
Friday, October 11, 2013 Zero Hedge In what world is it rational to decide that dumping 800,000 ounces of notional gold into the London Fix (or COMEX open) makes sense? In the space of 4 minutes, almost 2 million ounces notional were flushed into the gold futures markets dumping the price of gold to 3-month
When the Fed announced that it would not immediately begin reducing (tapering) its “asset purchases,” that was a watershed moment, and it will have tremendous impact on the gold and silver markets in the years ahead. For decades, Keynesian economists have asserted that governments can manage economies by deficit spending and money manipulation. Basic to
The following video is a short clip from a presentation given by Canadian billionaire Ned Goodman concerning the end of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency. When Nixon closed the gold window in 1971, severing the dollar’s final remaining link to gold, he did not destroy the currency’s international standing. In an ironic twist,
Larry Summers shocked — and gratified — the investment community when he asked not to be considered as the next chairman of the Federal Reserve. Stock indexes around the world rose on the news, with the belief that money will continue to flow freely around the world. Gold and silver prices did not respond immediately.
Black swan events often have great impact on the gold and silver markets. Discussed herein are three developments that should unfold between now and the end of the year that may turn out to be black swan events. First, Ben Bernanke does not want to be considered for a third term as Chairman of the
Here’s an interesting quote from Henry Ford: “It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.” Do you know what he is referring to? I would guess that less than one in a
“Gold smugglers run riot in India,” says Shivon Seth, writing on mineweb.com. This confirms that new regulations by the Central Bank of India have not dampened the buying of gold in the world’s second most populous country. Indian revenue authorities fear smuggling could rise to over 150% more than last year, Seth says. A long-time